🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.